 
			  
  An essential prerequisite to the efficient discovery of solutions to  daunting technological challenges is objectivity about the plausibility  of particular approaches, which is in turn founded upon objectivity  concerning what is already known and/or possible. In the case of  combating aging, prominent academics have been appropriately forthright  in highlighting the lack of objectivity in the descriptions of various  of the alleged anti-aging therapies that are currently available that  are provided by those who sell such therapies. In some cases, however,  these biogerontolgists have overstated the case and made  over-pessimistic criticisms of such products, which not only limits our  ability to defend against aging today but also undermines the reputation  of academia by appearing to be based on vested interests. Similar  problems apply to the overstated and premature rejection of proposals  for future therapies that are based on work not traditionally the  preserve of biogerontology, such as regenerative medicine. These flaws  are further exacerbated by the willingness of many high-profile  biogerontologists to collude with the media in the over-optimistic  presentation of the significance of advances that do fall within the  traditional scope of biogerontology. While such manipulation may be  forgiven as a natural response to the critical shortage of funding in  research, it nevertheless delays progress in developing truly effective  anti-aging therapies by distorting the view of the general public and of  policy-makers concerning what is and is not a promising way forward. In  my talk I will address all the above issues and discuss how we might  alleviate them. 
Dr. Aubrey de Grey is a biomedical gerontologist based in Cambridge, UK, and is the Chief Science Officer of SENS Foundation, a California-based charity dedicated to combating the aging process. He is also Editor-in-Chief of Rejuvenation Research, the world’s highest-impact peer-reviewed journal focused on intervention in aging. He received his BA and Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 1985 and 2000 respectively. His original field was computer science, and he did research in the private sector for six years in the area of software verification before switching to biogerontology in the mid-1990s. His research interests encompass the characterization of all the accumulating and eventually pathogenic molecular and cellular side-effects of metabolism (“damage”) that constitute mammalian aging and the design of interventions to repair and/or obviate that damage. He has developed a possibly comprehensive plan for such repair, termed Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS), which breaks aging down into seven major classes of damage and identifies detailed approaches to addressing each one. A key aspect of SENS is that it can potentially extend healthy lifespan without limit, even though these repair processes will probably never be perfect, as the repair only needs to approach perfection rapidly enough to keep the overall level of damage below pathogenic levels. Dr. de Grey has termed this required rate of improvement of repair therapies “longevity escape velocity”. Dr. de Grey is a Fellow of both the Gerontological Society of America and the American Aging Association, and sits on the editorial and scientific advisory boards of numerous journals and organizations.